Arbitrum Proposal of Returning 700M ARB Fails

Arbitrum DAO’s AIP-1.05, aiming to return 700M ARB tokens, was rejected by 84% votes, emphasizing governance holders’ control.

A contentious plan to return 700 million ARB governance tokens to Arbitrum’s DAO treasury was overwhelmingly voted down on April 15. The proposal, known as AIP-1.05, emerged after the Arbitrum Foundation moved funds in March without obtaining community consent.

The proposal was rejected by 84% of the total votes, with 118 million votes against it, while approximately 14.5% of the total, or 21 million ARB tokens, supported the proposal. About 2 million ARB tokens did not participate. The plan aimed to have the foundation return the tokens as a symbolic act to emphasize that the DAO’s governance holders, rather than the Arbitrum service provider or the Foundation, have ultimate control.

On the governance forum, a participant with 4.8 million ARB tokens argued that the proposal was merely a power play that would hinder the foundation’s ability to foster Arbitrum ecosystem growth by adding an unnecessary step. Another participant with 18 million ARB tokens opposed the proposal, emphasizing the need for balance between promoting decentralization and fostering progress in the ecosystem.

The Arbitrum community and its foundation are currently at odds over the foundation’s AIP-1 governance proposal, which requested nearly $1 billion worth of ARB tokens to finance its operations. Following community backlash, the foundation later clarified that AIP-1 was a ratification, not a proposal, and that some tokens had already been exchanged for stablecoins.

AIP-1 marked Arbitrum’s initial foray into governance after its token airdrop in early March. The foundation has since introduced a new series of improvement proposals to reengage in conversation with the community.

Previous Article

US Congress Presents Comprehensive Bill for Stablecoins

Next Article

Ripple Partner Bitso Teams Up with Mastercard

Related Posts
Read More

The Main Focus of the US Joint Committee Meeting: Cryptocurrency Regulation

The joint committee meeting in the US House of Representatives shows the complexities of defining regulatory boundaries for digital assets. While there is a bipartisan consensus on the need for crypto regulation, the meeting revealed the varying visions held by representatives, such as the importance of developing a regulatory framework for stablecoins and the different approaches toward the jurisdiction and oversight of tokens.