Binance US’ Users Crypto Assets Are No Longer FDIC Insured

The company, making changes in its terms of service, announced that users must convert assets removed from FDIC insurance into stablecoins or other cryptocurrencies before withdrawing them as US dollars.

Binance’s American entity, Binance US, announced that crypto assets on the platform have been removed from FDIC insurance. Users’ accounts and digital assets are no longer eligible for FDIC insurance protection. The company also made updates to its terms of service.

What is FDIC?

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was established in 1933 following the Great Depression by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The agency aims to protect American citizens’ money up to a certain amount in the event of a bank’s bankruptcy. In practice, the FDIC insures customers’ bank accounts up to $250,000 if a bank goes under.

Terms of Service Updated, FDIC Insurance Removed

In 2019, Binance US announced in a blog post that Binance US accounts were insured by the FDIC up to $250,000. According to that announcement, all USD deposits were held in pooled custodial accounts at multiple banks, and these accounts had direct access to FDIC insurance coverage.

However, a recent announcement indicated that this has changed. According to Binance US’s updated terms of service, users’ accounts and digital assets are no longer eligible for FDIC insurance protection. Furthermore, with this update, users now need to convert their US dollars into stablecoins or another cryptocurrency before making a direct withdrawal.

Source: Decrypt

Previous Article

Israel Continues to Freeze Binance Accounts: 200 More Accounts Under Investigation

Next Article

Bitmain Fires Four Employees Following Salary Announcement Leak

Related Posts
Read More

Decentralized Exchange SushiSwap Exploited

The decentralized exchange SushiSwap was attacked earlier today. The vulnerability on the platform is said to have resulted in users' tokens being sold on various networks such as bsc, eth, arbitrum, optimism, without their consent. Although it is believed that the source of the vulnerability is due to a fundamental reason within the contract, investigations are still ongoing regarding the matter.