Silvergate Bank’s Operations Under Scrutiny Following Federal Reserve Report

The Federal Reserve’s Inspector General conducted an in-depth investigation into the collapse of Silvergate Bank, culminating in a comprehensive report. The findings indicated that the bank’s downfall was a result of its excessive dependence on volatile crypto deposits coupled with flawed management practices.

In the early 2010s, Silvergate Bank was an ordinary bank unknown to many. However, in recent years, it has gained significant prominence in the world of cryptocurrency. By 2013, the bank had begun focusing on customers dealing in cryptocurrency transactions. Successfully executing this strategy for a while, the company increased its deposits from 1 billion dollars in 2017 to 16 billion dollars in 2021. This growth continued until the bank’s bankruptcy in March 2023.

However, with this rapid growth came increased risks. According to the Federal Reserve’s examinations, a large portion of these deposits was uninsured and non-interest-bearing, which led the bank to become a lender focused on a single sector. Major events in the crypto markets, such as the collapse of FTX, also negatively impacted the bank’s customer base.

Managerial Weaknesses Were the Primary Cause of the Bank’s Bankruptcy

The problems related to the bank losing its customer base were not solely limited to its dependency on cryptocurrency. Managerial mistakes and favoritism played a significant role in the bank’s downfall. Former CEO, Alan Lane, became a target of criticism for appointing several family members to high-ranking positions. However, the Federal Reserve report indicated that, in general, the bank’s capabilities in corporate governance and risk management were unable to adapt to its rapid growth and increasing complexity.

“The bank’s corporate governance and risk management capabilities did not keep pace with the bank’s rapid growth, increasing complexity, and evolving risk profile.”

Federal Reserve Report.

Had Silvergate more diligently followed banking regulations, it might not have found itself in this situation. However, the Federal Reserve should also have been more proactive in establishing new risk mitigation measures. Both the bank and the regulators made mistakes during this process, leading to Silvergate’s collapse.

Previous Article

Bear Market in Crypto Continues to Affect Companies: Chainaliz Lays Off 150 Staff

Next Article

Sam Bankman-Fried's Lawyers Requests the Ukrainian witness Not to Testify

Related Posts